Go to content

Selling Prices Decisions - New Project 5

Decision Making
Bean Counter
Title
Skip menu
Skip menu

Selling Prices Decisions

When applying incremental (differential) analysis to pricing decisions, each possible price for a given product represents an alternative course of action. The sales revenues for each alternative and the costs that differ between alternatives are the relevant amounts in these decisions. Total fixed costs often remain the same between pricing alternatives and, if so, may be ignored. In selecting a price for a product, the goal is to select the price at which total future revenues exceed total future costs by the greatest amount, thus maximizing income.

A high price is not necessarily the price that maximizes income. The product may have many substitutes. If a company sets a high price, the number of units sold may decline substantially as customers switch to lower-priced competitive products. Thus, in the maximization of income, the expected volume of sales at each price is as important as the contribution margin per unit of product sold. In making any pricing decision, management should seek the combination of price and volume that produces the largest total contribution margin. This combination is often difficult to identify in an actual situation because management may have to estimate the number of units that can be sold at each price.

Example 1 Pricing
Specialty Fried Chicken
For example, assume that Specialty Fried Chicken in the New York market estimates product demand for its large bucket of chicken for a particular period to be:
ChoiceDemand
115,000 units @ $6.00 per unit
212,000 @ $7.00 per unit
310,000 @ $8.00  per unit
47,000 @ $9.00 per unit
The company's fixed costs of  20,000 per year are not affected by the different volume alternatives. Variable costs are 5 per unit.
What price should be set for the product?

Based on incremental (differential) analysis using the contribution margin income statement as illustrated in the table below, the company should select a price of  8 per unit because choice (3) results in the greatest total contribution margin. In the short run, maximizing total contribution margin maximizes profits.

ChoiceUnits SoldUnit Sales Price
Unit Variable Costs
Unit Contribution MarginContribution Margin Dollars
Fixed Costs Dollars
Profit Dollars
115,00065115,00020,000(5,000)
212,00075224,00020,0004,000
310,00085330,00020,00010,000
47,00095428,00020,0008,000
Skip menu
Example 2 Pricing
Back Door Cafe
Change in Sales Price
The owner of Back Door has one of her employees conduct a survey of the other coffee shops in the area and finds that they are charging $0.75 more for espresso drinks. As a result, the owner wants to determine what would happen to operating income if she increased her price by just $0.50 and sales remained constant, so she performs the following analysis:
Price Change Analysis  

With Current Price
With New Price
Change
Sales price per unit$3.75$4.25$.50
Variable cost per unit$1.50$1.500
Contribution margin per unit$2.25$2.75$.50
Fixed costs$2,475
$2,475
0



Break Even in units1,100900(200)
Break Even in dollars$4,125$3,825($300)
Break Even Calculation Using Spreadsheet
Contribution Margin Income Statement  
Current Price versus New Price Change
Unit sales expected1,5001,5000
Sales$5,625$6,375$750
Variable costs2,2502,2500
Contribution margin$3,375$4,125$750
Fixed costs2,4752,4750
Net income$900$1,650$750
The only variable that has changed is the $0.50 increase in the price of their espresso drinks, but the net operating income will increase by $750. Another way to think of this increase in income is that, if the sales price increases by $0.50 per expresso drink and the estimated sales are 1,500 units, then this will result in an increase in overall contribution margin of $750. Moreover, since all of the fixed costs were met by the lower sales price, all of this $750 goes to profit. Again, this is assuming the higher sales price does not decrease the number of units sold. Since the other coffee shops will still be priced higher than Back Door, the owner believes that there will not be a decrease in sales volume.

When making this adjustment to their sales price, Back Door Café is engaging in target pricing, a process in which a company uses market analysis and production information to determine the maximum price customers are willing to pay for a good or service in addition to the markup percentage. If the good can be produced at a cost that allows both the desired profit percentage as well as deliver the good at a price acceptable to the customer, then the company should proceed with the product; otherwise, the company will not achieve its desired profit goals.
Example 2 Cost Changes
Change in Variable Cost
In March, the owner of Back Door receives a letter from her cups supplier informing her that there is a $0.05 price increase due to higher material prices. Assume that the example uses the original $3.75 per unit sales price. The owner wants to know what would happen to net operating income if she absorbs the cost increase, so she performs the following analysis:
Variable Cost Change Analysis  

With Current Price
With Variable Cost Increase
Change
Sales price per unit$3.75$3.750
Variable cost per unit$1.50$1.55$.05
Contribution margin per unit$2.25$2.20($.05)
Fixed costs$2,475
$2,475
0



Break Even in units1,1001,12525
Break Even in dollars$4,125$4,219$94
Contribution Margin Income Statement  
Current Variable Costs versus New Variable CostsChange
Unit sales expected1,5001,5000
Sales$5,625$5,6250
Variable costs2,2502,32575
Contribution margin$3,375$3,300($75)
Fixed costs2,4752,4750
Net income$900$825($75)
She is surprised to see that just a $0.05 increase in variable costs (cups) will reduce her net income by $75. The owner may decide that she is fine with the lower income, but if she wants to maintain her income, she will need to find a new cup supplier, reduce other costs, or pass the price increase on to her customers. Because the increase in the cost of the cups was a variable cost, the impact on net income can be seen by taking the increase in cost per unit, $0.05, and multiplying that by the units expected to be sold, 1,500, to see the impact on the contribution margin, which in this case would be a decrease of $75. This also means a decrease in net income of $75.
Example 2 Cost Changes
Change in Fixed Cost
Back Door Café’s lease is coming up for renewal. The owner calls the landlord to indicate that she wants to renew her lease for another 5 years. The landlord is happy to hear she will continue renting from him but informs her that the rent will increase $225 per month. She is not certain that she can afford an additional $225 per month and tells him she needs to look at her numbers and will call him back. She pulls out her Cost Volume Profit spreadsheet and adjusts her monthly fixed costs upwards by $225. Assume that the example uses the original $3.75 per unit sales price. The results of her analysis of the impact of the rent increase on her annual net income are:
Fixed Costs Change Analysis  

With Current Price
With Increased Fixed Costs
Change
Sales price per unit$3.75$3.750
Variable cost per unit$1.50$1.500
Contribution margin per unit$2.25$2.250
Fixed costs$2,475
$2,700
$225



Break Even in units1,1001,200100
Break Even in dollars$4,125$4,500$425
Contribution Margin Income Statement  
Current Fixed Costs versus Increased Fixed CostsChange
Unit sales expected1,5001,500
Sales$5,625$5,6250
Variable costs2,2502,2500
Contribution margin$3,375$3,3750
Fixed costs2,4752,700225
Net income$900$675($225)
Because the rent increase is a change in a fixed cost, the contribution margin per unit remains the same. However, the break-even point in both units and dollars increase because more units of contribution are needed to cover the $225 monthly increase in fixed costs. If the owner of the Back Door agrees to the increase in rent for the new lease, she will likely look for ways to increase the contribution margin per unit to offset this increase in fixed costs.

In each of the prior examples, only one variable was changed—sales volume, variable costs, or fixed costs. There are some generalizations that can be made regarding how a change in any one of these variables affects the break-even point.

These generalizations are summarized below:
Generalizations Regarding Changes in Break Even Point from Changing One Variable
Sales Price Increase
Break-Even Point Decreases (Contribution Margin is Higher, Need Fewer Sales to Break Even)
Sales Price Decrease
Break-Even Point Increases (Contribution Margin is Lower, Need More Sales to Break Even)
Variable Costs Increase
Break-Even Point Increases (Contribution Margin is Lower, Need More Sales to Break Even)
Variable Costs Decrease
Break-Even Point Decreases (Contribution Margin is Higher, Need Fewer Sales to Break Even)
Fixed Costs Increase
Break-Even Point Increases (Contribution Margin Does Not Change, but Need More Sales to Meet Fixed Costs)
Fixed Costs Decrease
Break-Even Point Decreases (Contribution Margin Does Not Change, but Need Fewer Sales to Meet Fixed Costs)
Example 2 Equipment & Cost Changes
Changing Multiple Variables
We have analyzed situations in which one variable changes, but often, more than one change will occur at a time. For example, a company may need to lower its selling price to compete, but they may also be able to lower certain variable costs by switching suppliers. Suppose Back Door Café has the opportunity to purchase a new espresso machine that will reduce the amount of coffee beans required for an espresso drink by putting the beans under higher pressure. The new machine will cost $15,000, but it will decrease the variable cost per cup by $0.05. The owner wants to see what the effect will be on the net operating income and break-even point if she purchases the new machine. She has arranged financing for the new machine and the monthly payment will increase her fixed costs by $400 per month.When she conducts this analysis, she gets the following results:
Variable Costs and Fixed Costs Change Analysis  

With Current Price
With Decreased Variable and Increased Fixed
Change
Sales price per unit$3.75$3.750
Variable cost per unit$1.50$1.45($.05)
Contribution margin per unit$2.25$2.30$.05
Fixed costs$2,475
$2,875
$400



Break Even in units1,1001,250150
Break Even in dollars$4,125$4,688563
Contribution Margin Income Statement  
Current Costs versus New CostsChange
Unit sales expected1,5001,5000
Sales$5,625$5,6250
Variable costs2,2502,175(75)
Contribution margin$3,375$3,450$75
Fixed costs2,4752,875400
Net income$900$575($325)
Looking at the “what-if” analysis, we see that the contribution margin per unit increases because of the $0.05 reduction in variable cost per unit. As a result, she has a higher total contribution margin available to cover fixed expenses. This is good, because the monthly payment on the espresso machine represents an increased fixed cost. Even though the contribution margin ratio increases, it is not enough to totally offset the increase in fixed costs, and her monthly break-even point has risen from $4,125 to $4,688. and her profits have decreased  $325. If the new break-even point in units is a realistic number (within the relevant range), then she would decide to purchase the new machine because, once it has been paid for, her break-even point will fall and her net income will rise. Performing this analysis is an effective way for managers and business owners to look into the future, so to speak, and see what impact business decisions will have on their financial position.
Let’s look at another option the owner of the Back Door Café has to consider when making the decision about this new machine. What would happen if she purchased the new machine to realize the variable cost savings and also raised her price by just $0.20? She feels confident that such a small price increase will go virtually unnoticed by her customers but may help her offset the increase in fixed costs.

She runs the analysis as follows:
Selling Price Variable Costs and Fixed Costs Change Analysis   

With Current Price
Decreased Variable Increased Fixed
Increased Price Decreased Variable Increased Fixed
Change
Sales price per unit$3.75$3.75$3.95$.20
Variable cost per unit$1.50$1.45$1.450
Contribution margin per unit$2.25$2.30$2.50$.20
Fixed costs$2,475$2,875
$2,875
0



Break Even in units1,1001,2501,150(100)
Break Even in dollars$4,125$4,688$4,543(145)
Contribution Margin Income Statement  Change
Unit sales expected1,5001,5001,5000
Sales$5,625$5,625$5,925$300
Variable costs2,2502,1752,1750
Contribution margin$3,375$3,450$3,750$300
Fixed costs2,4752,8752,8750
Net income$900$575$875$300
The analysis shows the expected result: an increase in the per-unit contribution margin, a decrease in the break-even point, and an increase in the net operating income of 300. She has changed three variables in her costs—sales price, variable cost, and fixed cost. In fact, the small price increase almost gets her back to the net operating income she realized before the purchase of the new expresso machine.

By now, you should begin to understand why Cost Volume Profit (CVP) analysis is such a powerful tool. The owner of Back Door Café can run an unlimited number of these what-if scenarios until she meets the financial goals for her company. There are very few tools in managerial accounting as powerful and meaningful as a cost-volume profit analysis.

Capital Budgeting
Let's take our analysis one step further and use Capital Budgeting to analyze our decision.

The  following information is presented. Your job is to use capital budgeting to determine if the machine is a good investment.
Equipment & Cost Savings
Equipment CostLife

$15,000
5 years



Required Rate Of Return
10%




SavingsVariable CostPrice Increase

$.05 per unit$.20 per unit



Sales UnitsPer MonthPer Year

1,500
18,000



SavingsPer MonthPer Year
Variable Costs
$75
$900
Sales Price Increase
$300
$3,600
Total Savings
$375
$4,500



Machine Investment
YearCash OutflowCash Inflow
Year 0
($15,000)

Years 1-5

$4,500
Our analysis shows that the investment in the machine is a good decision.
Net Present Value (NPV): $2,059 with a 10% return
Internal Rate Of Return:15.24%

Since the NPV is positive we should accept this project.

Capital Investment Calculations Spreadsheet

Did you notice we used two tools to anaylze this option ? Decisions often use more than one tool to evaluate the decision.
Break-Even Analysis Explained
Hopefully you noticed that break-even analysis was used in some prior examples (some examples I even used my spreadsheet to perform the calculations). Let's discuss the the basics.

The Basics of Break-Even Analysis in a Multi-Product Environment
In order to perform a break-even analysis for a company that sells multiple products or provides multiple services, it is important to understand the concept of a sales mix. A sales mix represents the relative proportions of the products that a company sells—in other words, the percentage of the company’s total revenue that comes from product A, product B, product C, and so forth. Sales mix is important to business owners and managers because they seek to have a mix that maximizes profit, since not all products have the same profit margin. Companies can maximize their profits if they are able to achieve a sales mix that is heavy with high-margin products, goods, or services. If a company focuses on a sales mix heavy with low-margin items, overall company profitability will often suffer. Performing a break-even analysis for these multi-product businesses is more complex because each product has a different selling price, a different variable cost, and, ultimately, a different contribution margin. We must also proceed under the assumption that the sales mix remains constant; if it does change, the CVP analysis must be revised to reflect the change in sales mix. For the sake of clarity, we will also assume that all costs are companywide costs, and each product contributes toward covering these companywide costs.

Calculating Break-Even Analysis in a Multi-Product Environment
Sales Mix
When a company sells more than one product or provides more than one service, break-even analysis is more complex because not all of the products sell for the same price or have the same costs associated with them:Each product has its own margin. Consequently, the break-even point in a multi-product environment depends on the mix of products sold. Further, when the mix of products changes, so does the break-even point. If demand shifts and customers purchase more low-margin products, then the break-even point rises. Conversely, if customers purchase more high-margin products, the break-even point falls. In fact, even if total sales dollars remain unchanged, the break-even point can change based on the sales mix. Let’s look at an example of how break-even analysis works in a multi-product environment. In multi-product Cost Volume Profit(CVP) analysis, the company’s sales mix is viewed as a composite unit, a selection of discrete products associated together in proportion to the sales mix. The composite unit is not sold to customers but is a concept used to calculate a combined contribution margin, which is then used to estimate the break-even point. Think of a composite unit as a virtual basket of fruit that contains the proportion of individual fruits equal to the company’s sales mix. If we purchased these items individually to make the fruit basket, each one would have a separate price and a different contribution margin. This is how a composite unit works in CVP analysis. We calculate the contribution margins of all of the component parts of the composite unit and then use the total to calculate the break-even point. It is important to note that fixed costs are allocated among the various components (products) that make up this composite unit. Should a product be eliminated from the composite unit or sales mix, the fixed costs must be re-allocated among the remaining products. If we use the fruit basket as an example, we can look at the individual fruits that make up the basket: apples, oranges, bananas, and pears. We see that each individual fruit has a selling price and a cost. Each fruit has its own contribution margin. But how would we determine the contribution margin for a composite of fruit, or in other words, for our basket of fruit? For our particular baskets, we will use 5 apples, 3 oranges, 2 bananas, and 1 pear. This means that our product mix is 5:3:2:1,  or  as a percentage of sales 45%, 27%, 18%, and 10% as shown below:
FruitNumber UnitsPercentage SalesPrice Per UnitTotal SalesCost Per UnitTotal CostContribution Margin
Apple545%$.60$3.00$.25$1.25$1.75
Orange327%$1.00$3.00$.70$2.25$.75
Bananna218%$.80$1.60$.50$1.00$.60
Pear110%$.90$1.90$1.50$1.50$.40
Total
100%
$9.50$6.00$3.50
Contribution Margin Based on Product Mix
Notice that the composite contribution margin is based on the number of units of each item that is included in the composite item. If we change the composition of the basket, then the composite contribution margin would change even though contribution margin of the individual items would not change. For example, if we only include 4 apples, the contribution margin of a single apple is still $0.35, but the contribution margin of the apples in the basket is $1.40, not $1.75 as it is when 5 apples are included in the basket. Let’s look at an additional example and see how we find the break-even point for a composite good.

Example 3  Break-Even Analysis
West Brothers
We will consider West Brothers for an example of a multi-product break-even analysis. West Brothers manufactures and sells 3 types of house siding: restoration vinyl, architectural vinyl, and builder grade vinyl,each with its own sales price, variable cost, and contribution margin, as shown:

Sales Price Per Square FootVariable Cost Per Square FootContribution Margin Per Square Foot
Builder Grade$6.25$3.25$3.00
Architectural$7.25$4.50$3.25
Restoration$9.25$6.25$3.00
The sales mix for West Brothers is 5 ft2 of builder grade to 3 ft2 of architectural grade to 2 ft2 of restoration grade vinyl (a ratio of 5:3:2). This sales mix represents  50% Sales of Builder Grade -30% Sales of Architectural Grade -20% Sales of Restoration Grade:
West Brothers’ fixed costs are $145,000 per year, and the variable costs for one composite unit are:
We will calculate the weighted contribution margin as follows:
Weighted Contribution Margin Sales Mix PercentageSales PriceWeighted Sales Price Product Contribution MarginWeighted Contribution Margin
Builder Grade50%$6.25$3.13$3.00$1.50
Architectural30%$7.75$2.32$3.25.98
Restoration20%$9.25$1.85$3.00.60
Total 100%$7.30$9.25$3.08

We now use the average  contribution margin to determine West Brothers’ break-even point:
Break-Even Point  = Total fixed costs / Average Contribution margin  = $145,000 / $3.08 = 47,154  composite units

To determine how many of each product and the sales amount of each product  West Brothers needs to sell, we apply their sales mix ratio 50%-30%-20% to the break-even quantity as follows:
Break Even QuantitySales Mix %Calculated UnitsSales Price Per UnitCalculated Sales
Builder Grade50%23,577$6.25$147,356
Architectural
30%14,146$7.75$109,632
Restoration
20%9,431$9.25$87,237
Total
47,154
$344,225
West Brothers will break even when it sells 47,154 units with a sales value of .$344,225.


For planning purposes, West Brothers can change the sales mix, sales price, or variable cost of one or more of the products in the composite unit and perform a “what-if” analysis.

Caution: Ignoring relevant range(s) in setting assumptions about cost behavior and ignoring the actual demand for the product in the company's market also distorts the information provided to management and may cause the management of the company to produce products that cannot be sold.
Title
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.
Back to content